Same 6 answers re-derived weekly; a skill would carry the approved bank.
Skills
The org's checked-in procedures: who owns each one, whether it fires, what it saves, and the repeated work still waiting to become one.
The library — every skill, its life and its pulse
9 active · 1 stale · sorted by invocationsSkillSourceOwnerVersionInvocationsTrendAutoAudit
Project skills live in the repo, personal in ~/.claude/skills, plugins from a marketplace. Audit flags mark external fetches or bundled scripts — review before trusting.
Do skills pay for themselves?
saved tokens vs freehand · directional/code-review
$2,140saved · 30D3.1ktok / run4/5teams
/deploy-runbook
$980saved · 30D2.4ktok / run3/5teams
/incident-triage
$1,310saved · 30D2.3ktok / run5/5teams
/db-migration-checklist
$520saved · 30D1.8ktok / run2/5teams
/test-writer
$610saved · 30D1.5ktok / run3/5teams
/security-review
$440saved · 30D2.9ktok / run2/5teams
/release-notes
$190saved · 30D1.1ktok / run3/5teams
/escalation-answersnew
$370saved · 30D3.3ktok / run1/5teams
/repo-onboarding
$160saved · 30D4.2ktok / run2/5teams
/pdf-toolsnever fires
$0saved · 30D—tok / run1/5teams
Work that should be a skill — and isn't yet
repeated Work Units with no skill behind themVendor security questionnaires31× / mo
$840 / mo re-derived freehandSprint summary drafting18× / mo
$310 / mo re-derived freehandEvery lead writes it freehand; format is identical.
Eval harness setup12× / mo
$280 / mo re-derived freehandRamil's batch flow is repeated by hand on Codex.
Candidates come from Work Unit clustering — the same shape of work, repeated, with no checked-in procedure. Drafts land in the Memory review inbox.



